
As a teacher, am I more concerned with being feared or loved? And by loved, I don't mean LOOVED, I mean respected and open. Should I be putting the fear of my terrible wrath into them

Call me Cuckoo Mc Crazyton, call me Mary Poppins-ranka, but I think students shouldn't be afraid of me. I don't think students learn better if they live in fear of my judgment upon them. I know it is really tempting to be all-knowing and all-powerful, but in the end, where does it get me? I am not all-knowing or all-powerful, so why should I keep my students at a distance from this finite amount of knowledge? What am I afraid of? If I cultivate an atmosphere of respect, openness, and humor tossed in with some good boundaries, then my students won't be afraid to come seek me out for help. My door is always open, and my lunches and free moments are taken up with students who have good questions. I am happy to answer questions, and no question is too silly to be asked. My favorite teaching moments are when I meet with the student who wants to write a better intro, or the student who wants help dissecting a poem.
I want to be loved. Not LOOOOVED, but I want my students to know that I am an advocate for their learning, not a hindrance to their education.
2 comments:
The dilemma with which you're struggling is a succinct application of the political philosophy of George Lakoff from the point of view of a classroom teacher.
Lakoff believes (based on years of neuro cognitive research) that the great political divide is between authoritarians and those who driven to nurture. You clearly fall in the latter camp, and I say more power to you for it. Authoritarians give us bullies and wars; nurturing people healing and growth. Like you, I definitely favor the latter.
If you are not familiar with Lakoff's work, you might want to begin with this essay he wrote for the Nation in 2004.
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20041206/lakoff
Mary Poppins-ranka - love it!
Post a Comment